Hi Qais, On Friday 03 Apr 2020 at 13:30:19 (+0100), Qais Yousef wrote: <snip> > + /* > + * The new value will be applied to all RT tasks the next time they > + * wakeup, assuming the task is using the system default and not a user > + * specified value. In the latter we shall leave the value as the user > + * requested. > + */ > if (sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min > sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max || > sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_max > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) { > result = -EINVAL; > goto undo; > } > > + if (sysctl_sched_rt_default_uclamp_util_min > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) { > + result = -EINVAL; > + goto undo; > + } Hmm, checking: if (sysctl_sched_rt_default_uclamp_util_min > sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min) would probably make sense too, but then that would make writing in sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min cumbersome for sysadmins as they'd need to lower the rt default first. Is that the reason for checking against SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE? That might deserve a comment or something. <snip> > @@ -1241,9 +1293,13 @@ static void uclamp_fork(struct task_struct *p) > for_each_clamp_id(clamp_id) { > unsigned int clamp_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id); > > - /* By default, RT tasks always get 100% boost */ > + /* > + * By default, RT tasks always get 100% boost, which the admins > + * are allowed to change via > + * sysctl_sched_rt_default_uclamp_util_min knob. > + */ > if (unlikely(rt_task(p) && clamp_id == UCLAMP_MIN)) > - clamp_value = uclamp_none(UCLAMP_MAX); > + clamp_value = sysctl_sched_rt_default_uclamp_util_min; > > uclamp_se_set(&p->uclamp_req[clamp_id], clamp_value, false); > } And that, as per 20200414161320.251897-1-qperret@xxxxxxxxxx, should not be there :) Otherwise the patch pretty looks good to me! Thanks, Quentin