On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 07:05:22AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > + /* read after we'd reached the end? */ > + if (*pos && list_empty(&mnt->mnt_list)) > + return NULL; > + > + lock_ns_list(p->ns); > + if (!*pos) > + mnt = list_first_entry(&p->ns->list, typeof(*mnt), mnt_list); > + mnt = mnt_skip_cursors(p->ns, mnt); > + unlock_ns_list(p->ns); > > - p->cached_event = p->ns->event; > - p->cached_mount = seq_list_start(&p->ns->list, *pos); > - p->cached_index = *pos; > - return p->cached_mount; > + return mnt; > } Hmm... I wonder if it would be better to do something like if (!*pos) prev = &p->ns->list.next; else prev = &p->mnt.mnt_list.next; mnt = mnt_skip_cursors(p->ns, prev); > static void *m_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos) > { > struct proc_mounts *p = m->private; > + struct mount *mnt = v; > + > + lock_ns_list(p->ns); > + mnt = mnt_skip_cursors(p->ns, list_next_entry(mnt, mnt_list)); ... and mnt = mnt_skip_cursors(p->ns, &mnt->mnt_list.next);