When "ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs" introduced atime
support to ubifs, it also added lazytime support. As far as I can tell
the lazytime support is terminally broken, as it causes
mark_inode_dirty_sync to be called from __writeback_single_inode, which
will then trigger the locking assert in ubifs_dirty_inode. Just remove
the broken lazytime support for now, it can be added back later,
especially as some infrastructure changes should make that easier soon.
Fixes: 8c1c5f263833 ("ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
fs/ubifs/file.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
index 743928efffc1..49fe062ce45e 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
@@ -1375,7 +1375,6 @@ int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time,
struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
struct ubifs_budget_req req = { .dirtied_ino = 1,
.dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(ui->data_len, 8) };
- int iflags = I_DIRTY_TIME;
int err, release;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT))
@@ -1393,11 +1392,8 @@ int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time,
if (flags & S_MTIME)
inode->i_mtime = *time;
- if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME))
- iflags |= I_DIRTY_SYNC;
-
release = ui->dirty;
- __mark_inode_dirty(inode, iflags);
+ __mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC);
mutex_unlock(&ui->ui_mutex);
if (release)
ubifs_release_budget(c, &req);
--
2.25.1
