Re: [PATCH v3 10/14] fanotify: divorce fanotify_path_event and fanotify_fid_event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 30-03-20 13:42:03, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> >
> > Ah, right. Thanks for clarification. Actually, I think now that we have
> > fanotify event 'type' notion, I'd like to make overflow event a separate
> > type which will likely simplify a bunch of code (e.g. we get rid of a
> > strange corner case of 'path' being included in the event but being
> > actually invalid). Not sure whether I'll do it for this merge window,
> > probably not since we're in a bit of a hurry.
> >
> 
> Jan,
> 
> I went a head and did those 2 cleanups you suggested to
> fanotify_alloc_event(). pushed result to fsnotify-fixes branch.
> Probably no rush to get those into this merge window.
> For your consideration.

Thanks! Since the merge window is already open, I'd queue these fixes for
the next merge window together with the remaining fanotify work...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux