Re: [PATCH 1/9] XArray: fix comment on Zero/Retry entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] XArray: fix comment on Zero/Retry entry
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:42:42 +0000
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200330124613.GX22483@bombadil.infradead.org>
Reply-to: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 05:46:13AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:36:35PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Correct the comment according to definition.
>
>You should work off linux-next; it's already fixed in commit
>24a448b165253b6f2ab1e0bcdba9a733007681d6

Oh, thanks

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

References:
- [PATCH 0/9] XArray: several cleanups
  - From: Wei Yang
- [PATCH 1/9] XArray: fix comment on Zero/Retry entry
  - From: Wei Yang
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] XArray: fix comment on Zero/Retry entry
  - From: Matthew Wilcox

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] XArray: simplify the calculation of shift
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] XArray: internal node is a xa_node when it is bigger than XA_ZERO_ENTRY
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/9] XArray: fix comment on Zero/Retry entry
Next by thread: [PATCH 5/9] XArray: entry in last level is not expected to be a node
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux