On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > Alternatively, we could decide that the temporarily allocation of 64k > > is no big deal. > > An order-4 allocation is not something that can be relied upon. I would > rather find a way to avoid the need for it if at all possible. It's not strictly an order-4 allocation anymore, as I changed svcxdr_tmpalloc to use kvmalloc. But sure, it's best to avoid it, it's a waste. - Frank
