On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:54:20PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Michal Suchanek's on March 19, 2020 10:19 pm:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > index 4b0152108f61..a264989626fd 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save();
> > struct ksignal ksig = { .sig = 0 };
> > int ret;
> > - int is32 = is_32bit_task();
> >
> > BUG_ON(tsk != current);
> >
> > @@ -277,7 +276,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >
> > rseq_signal_deliver(&ksig, tsk->thread.regs);
> >
> > - if (is32) {
> > + if (is_32bit_task()) {
> > if (ksig.ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
> > ret = handle_rt_signal32(&ksig, oldset, tsk);
> > else
>
> Unnecessary?
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > index 87d95b455b83..2dcbfe38f5ac 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5,
> > long r6, long r7, long r8,
> > unsigned long r0, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > - unsigned long ti_flags;
> > syscall_fn f;
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_IRQ_SOFT_MASK_DEBUG))
> > @@ -68,8 +67,7 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5,
> >
> > local_irq_enable();
> >
> > - ti_flags = current_thread_info()->flags;
> > - if (unlikely(ti_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE)) {
> > + if (unlikely(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE)) {
> > /*
> > * We use the return value of do_syscall_trace_enter() as the
> > * syscall number. If the syscall was rejected for any reason
> > @@ -94,7 +92,7 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5,
> > /* May be faster to do array_index_nospec? */
> > barrier_nospec();
> >
> > - if (unlikely(ti_flags & _TIF_32BIT)) {
> > + if (unlikely(is_32bit_task())) {
>
> Problem is, does this allow the load of ti_flags to be used for both
> tests, or does test_bit make it re-load?
>
> This could maybe be fixed by testing if(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) &&
Both points already discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/13fa324dc879a7f325290bf2e131b87eb491cd7b.1573576649.git.msuchanek@xxxxxxx/
Thanks
Michal
