Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] fanotify: prepare to encode both parent and child fid's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun 08-03-20 09:29:08, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > To see what the benefit of inherit fanotify_fid_event is, I did a test patch
> > to get rid of it and pushed the result to fanotify_name-wip:
> >
> > * b7eb8314c61b - fanotify: do not inherit fanotify_name_event from
> > fanotify_fid_event
> >
> > IMO, the removal of inheritance in this struct is artificial and
> > brings no benefit.
> > There is not a single line of code that improved IMO vs. several added
> > helpers which abstract something that is pretty obvious.
> >
> > That said, I don't mind going with this variant.
> > Let me you what your final call is.
> >
> 
> Eventually, it was easier to work the non-inherited variant into the series
> as the helpers aid with abstracting things as the series progresses and
> because object_fh is added to fanotify_name_event late in the series.
> So I went with your preference.
> 
> Pushed the work to fanotify_name branch.
> Let me know if you want me to post v3.

So I went through the patches - had only minor comments for most of them.
Can you post the next revision by email and I'll pickup at least the
obvious preparatory patches to my tree. Thanks!

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux