Re: [PATCH 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> We expect users will issue fsync/msync like a regular filesystem to
> make changes persistent. So in that aspect, rejecting MAP_SYNC
> makes sense. I will test and see if current code is rejecting MAP_SYNC
> or not.

Last time I checked, it did. Here's the test program that I wrote for
that:
https://github.com/intel/pmem-csi/blob/ee3200794a1ade49a02df6f359a134115b409e90/test/cmd/pmem-dax-check/main.go

-- 
Best Regards

Patrick Ohly



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux