On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 4:56 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> - !(flags & WALK_FOLLOW || nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW) ||
> - flags & WALK_NOFOLLOW) {
> + ((flags & WALK_TRAILING) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW)) ||
> + (flags & WALK_NOFOLLOW)) {
Oh, and here you fix the implicit precedence thing I was complaining
about earlier.
Maybe my original complaint had happened at this point, and I'd missed
the original place.
Likely.
Linus
