On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:19:39AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Is ext4_dio_read_iter() broken? It calls: > > file_accessed(iocb->ki_filp); > > at the end of the function - but surely iocb should be expected to have been > freed when iocb->ki_complete() was called? > > In my cachefiles rewrite, I'm seeing the attached kasan dump. The offending > RIP, ext4_file_read_iter+0x12b is at the above line, where it is trying to > read iocb->ki_filp. > > Here's an excerpt of the relevant bits from my code: > > static void cachefiles_read_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret, long ret2) > { > struct cachefiles_kiocb *ki = > container_of(iocb, struct cachefiles_kiocb, iocb); > struct fscache_io_request *req = ki->req; > ... > fput(ki->iocb.ki_filp); > kfree(ki); > fscache_end_io_operation(req->cookie); > ... > } > > int cachefiles_read(struct fscache_object *obj, > struct fscache_io_request *req, > struct iov_iter *iter) > { > struct cachefiles_object *object = > container_of(obj, struct cachefiles_object, fscache); > struct cachefiles_kiocb *ki; > struct file *file = object->backing_file; > ssize_t ret = -ENOBUFS; > ... > ki = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cachefiles_kiocb), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ki) > goto presubmission_error; > > ki->iocb.ki_filp = get_file(file); > ki->iocb.ki_pos = req->pos; > ki->iocb.ki_flags = IOCB_DIRECT; > ki->iocb.ki_hint = ki_hint_validate(file_write_hint(file)); > ki->iocb.ki_ioprio = get_current_ioprio(); > ki->req = req; > > if (req->io_done) > ki->iocb.ki_complete = cachefiles_read_complete; > > ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file, &ki->iocb.ki_pos, iov_iter_count(iter)); > if (ret < 0) > goto presubmission_error_free; > > fscache_get_io_request(req); > trace_cachefiles_read(object, file_inode(file), req); > ret = call_read_iter(file, &ki->iocb, iter); > ... > } > > The allocation point, cachefiles_read+0xd0, is the kzalloc() you can see and > the free point, cachefiles_read_complete+0x86, is the kfree() in the callback > function. It looks to me like you are creating your own iocb that you are doing AIO+DIO on, and you aren't taking a reference count to the iocb yourself to ensure that it exists for the entire submission path. i.e. see how the AIO code uses ki_refcnt and iocb_put() to ensure the iocb does not get destroyed by IO completion before the submission path has completed. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx