Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:39 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> These functions have very little to do with de_thread move them out >> of de_thread an into flush_old_exec proper so it can be more clearly >> seen what flush_old_exec is doing. >> >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/exec.c | 10 +++++----- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c >> index ff74b9a74d34..215d86f77b63 100644 >> --- a/fs/exec.c >> +++ b/fs/exec.c >> @@ -1189,11 +1189,6 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk) >> /* we have changed execution domain */ >> tsk->exit_signal = SIGCHLD; >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS >> - exit_itimers(sig); >> - flush_itimer_signals(); >> -#endif >> - >> BUG_ON(!thread_group_leader(tsk)); >> return 0; >> >> @@ -1277,6 +1272,11 @@ int flush_old_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) >> if (retval) >> goto out; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS >> + exit_itimers(me->signal); >> + flush_itimer_signals(); >> +#endif > > nit: exit_itimers() has a comment referring to de_thread, that should > probably be updated Good point. Eric