Re: [PATCH 00/17] VFS: Filesystem information and notifications [ver #17]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 08:45:23PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 08:38:44PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 08:37:05PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > 
> > > You are misreading mntput_no_expire(), BTW - your get_mount() can
> > > bloody well race with umount(2), hitting the moment when we are done
> > > figuring out whether it's busy but hadn't cleaned ->mnt_ns (let alone
> > > set MNT_DOOMED) yet.  If somebody calls umount(2) on a filesystem that
> > > is not mounted anywhere else, they are not supposed to see the sucker
> > > return 0 until the filesystem is shut down.  You break that.
> > 
> > While we are at it, d_alloc_parallel() requires i_rwsem on parent held
> > at least shared.
> 
> Egads...  Let me see if I got it right - you are providing procfs symlinks
> to objects on the internal mount of that thing.  And those objects happen
> to be directories, so one can get to their parent that way.  Or am I misreading
> that thing?

IDGI.  You have (in your lookup) kstrtoul, followed by snprintf, followed
by strcmp and WARN_ON() in case of mismatch?  Is there any point in having
stat(2) on "00" spew into syslog?  Confused...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux