Re: [LSFMMBPF TOPIC] Killing LSFMMBPF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/6/20 9:35 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hello,

This has been a topic that I've been thinking about a lot recently, mostly because of the giant amount of work that has been organizing LSFMMBPF.  I was going to wait until afterwards to bring it up, hoping that maybe it was just me being done with the whole process and that time would give me a different perspective, but recent discussions has made it clear I'm not the only one.

LSFMMBPF is not useful to me personally, and not an optimal use of the communities time.  The things that we want to get out of LSFMMBPF are (generally)

It has been pointed out to me that this appears to make it sound like I think the whole conference is useless. I would like to make it clear that this is not the case at all. This is still the only conference that I make sure to make it to every year, because all of the reasons I list.

The point of me posting this is to get us to put some real thought into what would be the most optimal way to accomplish the same things in a different way. Maybe I should have titled it "Make LSFMMBPF great again!" instead.

I feel that there is a lot of fat to trim here, and many voices not being heard because of the way the conference is organized. If I'm the only one then that's cool, but if I'm not I'd like people to think really hard about what the ideal meetup looks like, and how we can move in that direction. Thanks,

Josef



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux