Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: YunQiang Su <syq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 09:13:50 +0100
Cc: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, libc-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Laurent Vivier <laurent@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200306080905.173466-1-syq@debian.org> (YunQiang Su's message of "Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:09:05 +0800")

* YunQiang Su:

> +	if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_PRESERVE_ARGV0)
> +		flags |= AT_FLAGS_PRESERVE_ARGV0;
> +	NEW_AUX_ENT(AT_FLAGS, flags);

Is it necessary to reuse AT_FLAGS?  I think it's cleaner to define a
separate AT_ tag dedicated to binfmt_misc.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
  - From: Laurent Vivier

References:
- [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
  - From: YunQiang Su

Prev by Date: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
Previous by thread: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux