Re: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 12:17 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:45:22PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > This patch adds the CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING option which allows to remove
> > support for advisory locks. With this patch enabled, the flock()
> > system call, the F_GETLK, F_SETLK and F_SETLKW operations of fcntl()
> > and NFS support are disabled. These features are not necessarly needed
> > on embedded systems. It allows to save ~11 Kb of kernel code and data:
> > 
> >    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> > 1125436	 118764	 212992	1457192	 163c28	vmlinux.old
> > 1114299	 118564	 212992	1445855	 160fdf	vmlinux
> >  -11137    -200       0  -11337   -2C49 +/-
> > 
> > This patch has originally been written by Matt Mackall
> > <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, and is part of the Linux Tiny project.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In principle, I think this is a great idea.
> 
> >  config NFS_FS
> >  	tristate "NFS client support"
> > -	depends on INET
> > +	depends on INET && FILE_LOCKING
> >  	select LOCKD
> >  	select SUNRPC
> >  	select NFS_ACL_SUPPORT if NFS_V3_ACL
> 
> I think this part is a little lazy.  It should be possible to support
> NFS without file locking.  I suspect that's really not in-scope for the
> linux-tiny tree as currently envisaged with the focus on embedded
> devices that probably don't use NFS anyway.  Do we want to care about
> the situation of a machine with fixed workload, that doesn't need file
> locking, but does use NFS?

I would lean towards no, but if someone comes along who cares, they're
welcome to try it. This stuff all has to strike a balance between
savings and effort/complexity/maintainability, so any time the submitter
is too lazy to cover a less common use case, it's probably a good sign
they're approaching that tipping point. 

On the other hand, if you think it's trivial to do a locking-ectomy on
NFS, I'd be happy to see it.

The typical embedded NFS-based devices are NAS servers and media players
and are going to be more concerned about things like page cache
balancing.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux