Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: use non-movable memory for superblock readahead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:49:13AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 5:14 PM, Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Since commit a8ac900b8163 ("ext4: use non-movable memory for the
> > superblock") buffers for ext4 superblock were allocated using
> > the sb_bread_unmovable() helper which allocated buffer heads
> > out of non-movable memory blocks. It was necessarily to not block
> > page migrations and do not cause cma allocation failures.
> > 
> > However commit 85c8f176a611 ("ext4: preload block group descriptors")
> > broke this by introducing pre-reading of the ext4 superblock.
> > The problem is that __breadahead() is using __getblk() underneath,
> > which allocates buffer heads out of movable memory.
> > 
> > It resulted in page migration failures I've seen on a machine
> > with an ext4 partition and a preallocated cma area.
> > 
> > Fix this by introducing sb_breadahead_unmovable() and
> > __breadahead_gfp() helpers which use non-movable memory for buffer
> > head allocations and use them for the ext4 superblock readahead.
> > 
> > v2: found a similar issue in __ext4_get_inode_loc()
> > 
> > Fixes: 85c8f176a611 ("ext4: preload block group descriptors")
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>

Is it good to go?
Can it go through the ext4 tree?

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux