Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Zach Brown wrote: >> Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>> I think rehashing the new dentry is bogus, even on error. >> So we'd just come back through lookup to repopulate the existing >> destination name that vfs_rename_dir() unhashed before calling >> ->rename() in the case that the rename fails? That seems gross, but >> relatively harmless. > > We are talking about an _extremely_ rare event. Agreed, which is why I called it relatively harmless. - z -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
