On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:06:32PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > The test currently assumes a file system block size of 4k. It will > work just fine on any user-specified block size, though. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/xfs/300 | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300 > index 28608b81..4f1c927a 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/300 > +++ b/tests/xfs/300 > @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 0 4096" $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals >> $seqres.full > cat $SCRATCH_MNT/attrvals | attr -s name $SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > > # Fragment the file by writing backwards > +bs=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) > for I in `seq 6 -1 0`; do > - dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=4k \ > + dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=${bs} \ Although the original case won't fail on 64k test. But this change makes more sense. Thanks, Zorro > oflag=direct count=1 conv=notrunc >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > done > > -- > 2.19.1 >