Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What's the best way to write a lockdep assertion? > > > > BUG_ON(!lockdep_is_held(lock)); > > lockdep_assert_held(lock) is the normal way, I think - that will > WARN() if lockdep is enabled and the lock is not held. Okay. But what's the best way with a seqlock_t? It has two dep maps in it. Do I just ignore the one attached to the spinlock? David
