[LSF/MM/BPF Topic] Lets have the Interface debate: configfd vs fsconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've made the case in email that interfaces should always be as general
as they can be.  The counter argument is that interfaces which are too
general can be too powerful and hard for containment logic, like
seccomp, to properly constrain and predict the outcomes from the
various parameters.  So lets have that debate.  My argument is that
essentially we're good enough to handle the power wisely and we can
design interfaces, like configfd, to have easy introspection properties
for confinement tools, and I'm happy to debate this with anyone on the
less power makes easier interfaces side.

James




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux