Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Multi-actuator HDDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 10:26 -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:01:13PM -0600, Muhammad Ahmad wrote:
> > For NVMe HDDs are namespaces the appropriate abstraction of the
> > multiple actuators?
> 
> This sounds closer to what "NVM Sets" defines rather than namespaces.
> Section 4.9 from NVMe 1.4 spec has additional details if interested.

I've got to say that since multi-actuator devices will always be
spinning rust, bending NVMe concepts to fit them seems horribly wrong
... as does adding any rotational devices to NVMe: You just built a
clean NVM stack ... let's not contaminate it.

James




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux