On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 03:09:13PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 06:40, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Greg, > Thank you for your review! > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:47:56AM +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote: > > > When the module is being removed, the module state is set to > > > MODULE_STATE_GOING. At this point, try_module_get() fails. > > > And when {full/open}_proxy_open() is being called, > > > it calls try_module_get() to try to hold module reference count. > > > If it fails, it warns about the possibility of debugfs file leak. > > > > > > If {full/open}_proxy_open() is called while the module is being removed, > > > it fails to hold the module. > > > So, It warns about debugfs file leak. But it is not the debugfs file > > > leak case. So, this patch just adds module state checking routine > > > in the {full/open}_proxy_open(). > > > > > > Test commands: > > > #SHELL1 > > > while : > > > do > > > modprobe netdevsim > > > echo 1 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device > > > modprobe -rv netdevsim > > > done > > > > > > #SHELL2 > > > while : > > > do > > > cat /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsim1/ports/0/ipsec > > > done > > > > > > Splat looks like: > > > [ 298.766738][T14664] debugfs file owner did not clean up at exit: ipsec > > > [ 298.766766][T14664] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 14664 at fs/debugfs/file.c:312 full_proxy_open+0x10f/0x650 > > > [ 298.768595][T14664] Modules linked in: netdevsim(-) openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 n][ 298.771343][T14664] CPU: 2 PID: 14664 Comm: cat Tainted: G W 5.5.0+ #1 > > > [ 298.772373][T14664] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 > > > [ 298.773545][T14664] RIP: 0010:full_proxy_open+0x10f/0x650 > > > [ 298.774247][T14664] Code: 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 c1 04 00 00 49 8b 3c 24 e8 e4 b5 78 ff 84 c0 75 2d 4c 89 ee 48 > > > [ 298.776782][T14664] RSP: 0018:ffff88805b7df9b8 EFLAGS: 00010282[ 298.777583][T14664] RAX: dffffc0000000008 RBX: ffff8880511725c0 RCX: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 298.778610][T14664] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI: ffff8880540c5c14 > > > [ 298.779637][T14664] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: fffffbfff15235ad R09: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 298.780664][T14664] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffc06b5000 > > > [ 298.781702][T14664] R13: ffff88804c234a88 R14: ffff88804c22dd00 R15: ffffffff8a1b5660 > > > [ 298.782722][T14664] FS: 00007fafa13a8540(0000) GS:ffff88806c800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 298.783845][T14664] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > [ 298.784672][T14664] CR2: 00007fafa0e9cd10 CR3: 000000004b286005 CR4: 00000000000606e0 > > > [ 298.785739][T14664] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > [ 298.786769][T14664] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > [ 298.787785][T14664] Call Trace: > > > [ 298.788237][T14664] do_dentry_open+0x63c/0xf50 > > > [ 298.788872][T14664] ? open_proxy_open+0x270/0x270 > > > [ 298.789524][T14664] ? __x64_sys_fchdir+0x180/0x180 > > > [ 298.790169][T14664] ? inode_permission+0x65/0x390 > > > [ 298.790832][T14664] path_openat+0xc45/0x2680 > > > [ 298.791425][T14664] ? save_stack+0x69/0x80 > > > [ 298.791988][T14664] ? save_stack+0x19/0x80 > > > [ 298.792544][T14664] ? path_mountpoint+0x2e0/0x2e0 > > > [ 298.793233][T14664] ? check_chain_key+0x236/0x5d0 > > > [ 298.793910][T14664] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x170 > > > [ 298.794527][T14664] ? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1d0 > > > [ 298.795153][T14664] do_filp_open+0x16a/0x260 > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > Fixes: 9fd4dcece43a ("debugfs: prevent access to possibly dead file_operations at file open") > > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > v1 -> v2: > > > - Fix compile error > > > > > > fs/debugfs/file.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/debugfs/file.c b/fs/debugfs/file.c > > > index 634b09d18b77..e3075389fba0 100644 > > > --- a/fs/debugfs/file.c > > > +++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c > > > @@ -175,8 +175,13 @@ static int open_proxy_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > > > if (r) > > > goto out; > > > > > > - real_fops = fops_get(real_fops); > > > - if (!real_fops) { > > > + if (!fops_get(real_fops)) { > > > +#ifdef MODULE > > > + if (real_fops->owner && > > > + real_fops->owner->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING) > > > + goto out; > > > +#endif > > > > Why is this in a #ifdef? > > > > The real_fops->owner field will be present if MODULE is not enabled, > > right? Shouldn't this just work the same for that case? > > > > The reason for the #ifdef is to avoid compile error > MODULE_STATE_GOING is defined if CONFIG_MODULES is enabled. We should fix that in the .h file where that is defined so that we don't have to mess with stuff like this in a .c file. > So, If the #ifdef doesn't exist, compile will errors. > But honestly, I'm not sure whether CONFIG_MODULES should be used > here instead of MODULE or not. Neither, #ifdefs shouldn't be in .c files :) thanks, greg k-h