Re: [PATCH] fuse: Don't make buffered read forward overflow value to a userspace process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/6/20 8:14 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:37 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:37 AM Xiao Yang <ice_yangxiao@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Buffered read in fuse normally goes via:
-> generic_file_buffered_read()
   ------------------------------
   -> fuse_readpages()
     -> fuse_send_readpages()
   or
   -> fuse_readpage() [if fuse_readpages() fails to get page]
     -> fuse_do_readpage()
   ------------------------------
       -> fuse_simple_request()

Buffered read changes original offset to page-aligned length by left-shift
and extends original count to be multiples of PAGE_SIZE and then fuse
forwards these new parameters to a userspace process, so it is possible
for the resulting offset(e.g page-aligned offset + extended count) to
exceed the whole file size(even the max value of off_t) when the userspace
process does read with new parameters.

xfstests generic/525 gets "pread: Invalid argument" error on virtiofs
because it triggers this issue.  See the following explanation:
PAGE_SIZE: 4096, file size: 2^63 - 1
Original: offset: 2^63 - 2, count: 1
Changed by buffered read: offset: 2^63 - 4096, count: 4096
New offset + new count exceeds the file size as well as LLONG_MAX
Thanks for the report and analysis.

However this patch may corrupt the cache if i_size changes between
calls to fuse_page_length().  (e.g. first page length set to 33;
second page length to 45; then 33-4095 will be zeroed and 4096-4140
will be filled from offset 33-77).  This will be mitigated by the
pages being invalidated when i_size changes
(fuse_change_attributes()).  Filling the pages with wrong data is not
a good idea regardless.

I think the best approach is first to just fix the xfstest reported
bug by clamping the end offset to LLONG_MAX.  That's a simple patch,
independent of i_size, and hence trivial to verify and hard to mess
up.
Applied a fix and pushed to:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git#for-next

Hi Miklos,

Sorry for the late reply.

You have applied a fix quickly when I am going to send a patch today.

Just one comment for your fix:

I think we need to add the overflow check in fuse_send_readpages() and fuse_do_readpage().

Because generic_file_buffered_read() will call fuse_readpage() if fuse_readpages() fails to get page.

Thanks,

Xiao Yang


Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux