On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 10:25:43PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > > > @@ -1518,6 +1525,9 @@ static ssize_t fuse_direct_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to) > > > > res = __fuse_direct_read(&io, to, &iocb->ki_pos); > > } > > + inode_unlock_shared(inode); > > + > > + file_accessed(iocb->ki_filp); > > > Shouldn't the file_accessed() in different patch, with a description? It > looks totally unrelated to locking? > Thanks for your remind! file_accessed() is used to update atime for every direct read, it's totally unrelated to locking. I will separate it to another patch.
