Re: [PATCH] fix do_last() regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix do_last() regression
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:29:17 -0800
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200201162645.GJ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 8:26 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Brown paperbag time: fetching ->i_uid/->i_mode really should've been
> done from nd->inode.

I'm assuming you want me to apply this directly as a patch, or was it
meant as a heads-up with a future pull request?

                 Linus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fix do_last() regression
  - From: Al Viro

References:
- [PATCH] fix do_last() regression
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: rectify radix-tree testing entry in XARRAY
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix do_last() regression
Previous by thread: [PATCH] fix do_last() regression
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix do_last() regression
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux