Re: Q, SIGIO on pipe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Q, SIGIO on pipe
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:22:03 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17045.1578548716@jrobl>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Between v5.4 and v5.5-rc5, big changes are made around pipe and my test
> program behaves differently.

Do you have a full test program I can look at?

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q, SIGIO on pipe
  - From: J. R. Okajima

References:
- Q, SIGIO on pipe
  - From: J. R. Okajima

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] protect page cache from freeing inode
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Add a new sysctl to control uclamp_util_min
Previous by thread: Q, SIGIO on pipe
Next by thread: Re: Q, SIGIO on pipe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux