Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Do not pin pages for various direct-io scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 21-01-20 20:57:23, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> We can also discuss what kind of knobs we want to expose so that
> people can decide to choose the tradeof themself (ie from i want low
> latency io-uring and i don't care wether mm can not do its business; to
> i want mm to never be impeded in its business and i accept the extra
> latency burst i might face in io operations).

I do not think it is a good idea to make this configurable. How can
people sensibly choose between the two without deep understanding of
internals?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux