On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 10:17 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > new_inode() may return NULL, so only derefence the return inode when > non NULL. This is merely a cleanup as calling ubifs_inode() on a NULL > pointer doesn't do any harm, only using the return value would. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/ubifs/dir.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > index 0b98e3c8b461..cfce5fee9262 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c > +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > @@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *dir, > } > > inode = new_inode(c->vfs_sb); > - ui = ubifs_inode(inode); > if (!inode) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > + ui = ubifs_inode(inode); > /* > * Set 'S_NOCMTIME' to prevent VFS form updating [mc]time of inodes and > * marking them dirty in file write path (see 'file_update_time()'). Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> -- Thanks, //richard
