Re: mmotm 2019-12-10-19-14 uploaded (objtool: func() falls through)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 02:58:11PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:21:17PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 12/12/19 10:48 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:31:08AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >> On 12/10/19 7:14 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2019-12-10-19-14 has been uploaded to
> > >>>
> > >>>    http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > >>>
> > >>> mmotm-readme.txt says
> > >>>
> > >>> README for mm-of-the-moment:
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > >>>
> > >>> This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue.  Uploaded at random hopefully
> > >>> more than once a week.
> > >>>
> > >>> You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (5.x
> > >>> or 5.x-rcY).  The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in
> > >>> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series
> > >>>
> > >>> The file broken-out.tar.gz contains two datestamp files: .DATE and
> > >>> .DATE-yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss.  Both contain the string yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss,
> > >>> followed by the base kernel version against which this patch series is to
> > >>> be applied.
> > >>
> > >> on x86_64:
> > >>
> > >> drivers/hwmon/f71882fg.o: warning: objtool: f71882fg_update_device() falls through to next function show_pwm_auto_point_temp_hyst()
> > >> drivers/ide/ide-probe.o: warning: objtool: hwif_register_devices() falls through to next function hwif_release_dev()
> > >> drivers/ide/ide-probe.o: warning: objtool: ide_host_remove() falls through to next function ide_disable_port()
> > > 
> > > Randy, can you share the .o files?
> > 
> > Sure. They are attached.
> 
> These look like compiler bugs to me... execution is falling off the edge
> of the functions for no apparent reason.  Could potentially be triggered
> by the '#define if' trace code.

Randy, do you happen to have a config which triggers the above bugs?  I
can reduce the test cases and open a GCC bug.

-- 
Josh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux