Re: [patch 1/2] mm: dont clear PG_uptodate in invalidate_complete_page2()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:41:10PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi (miklos@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Is this nfs/fuse problem you described:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=121396920822693&w=2
> 
> Yes.

I do not know fuse good enough, but it looks like if your patch only
fixes issue for pages which are in splice buffer during invalidation,
any subsequent call for splice() will get correct new data (at least
invoke readpage(s)), but in the description of error there was a
long timeout between reading and writing, so it was a fresh splice()
call, which suddenly started to return errors.

Is it possible that by having uptodate bit in place, but page was
actually freed but not removed from all trees and so on, so it
masked read errors? This may be not the right conclusion though :)

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux