Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "David Howells" <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Al Viro" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
From: "Colin Walters" <walters@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:46:25 -0500
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Chris Mason" <clm@xxxxxx>, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxxx, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9351.1579025170@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
User-agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-754-g09d1619-fmstable-20200113v1

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, at 1:06 PM, David Howells wrote:

> Yes, I suggested AT_LINK_REPLACE as said magical flag.

This came up before right?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/cover.1524549513.git.osandov@xxxxxx/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
  - From: Amir Goldstein

References:
- Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
  - From: Al Viro
- Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
  - From: David Howells
- Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHSET v2 0/6] io_uring: add support for open/close
Next by Date: Re: [PATCHSET v2 0/6] io_uring: add support for open/close
Previous by thread: Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
Next by thread: Re: Making linkat() able to overwrite the target
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]