> We plan to treat this version as the future upstream for the code base > once merged, and all new features and bug fixes will go upstream first. > > v10: I find it interesting how the patch change log grew. > - Process length value as 1 when conversion is failed. Would this description be nicer without the word “is”? I pointed also further software development concerns out. I hope that they will get corresponding constructive feedback finally. Other contributors are similarly waiting for “effects” according to their code review comments. How will communication delays evolve for the clarification of remaining open issues? Regards, Markus
