Hi Chris, Thanks for looking at this patch. On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 02:53:55PM +0000, Chris Down wrote: > Chen Yu writes: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_CPU_RESCTRL > > + ONE("resctrl", S_IRUGO, proc_resctrl_show), > > There was already some discussion about "resctrl" by itself being a > misleading name, hence why the CONFIG option eventually became > CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL. Can you please rethink the name of this /proc file, > and have it at least be "cpu_resctrl" or "x86_resctrl" or similar? :-) Ok, I'll change the name from "resctrl" to "cpu_resctrl", because: 1. it is a CPU feature so a 'cpu' prefixed seems to be more obvious, 2. other CPUs than x86 could also use this file in the future. Thanks, Chenyu