On 1/8/20 4:05 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote: > Am 08.01.20 um 23:57 schrieb Jens Axboe: >> On 1/8/20 2:17 PM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote: >>> Am 07.01.20 um 18:00 schrieb Jens Axboe: >>>> Sending this out separately, as I rebased it on top of the work.openat2 >>>> branch from Al to resolve some of the conflicts with the differences in >>>> how open flags are built. >>> >>> Now that you rebased on top of openat2, wouldn't it be better to add >>> openat2 that to io_uring instead of the old openat call? >> >> The IORING_OP_OPENAT already exists, so it would probably make more sense >> to add IORING_OP_OPENAT2 alongside that. Or I could just change it. Don't >> really feel that strongly about it, I'll probably just add openat2 and >> leave openat alone, openat will just be a wrapper around openat2 anyway. > > Great, thanks! Here: https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-5.6/io_uring-vfs Not tested yet, will wire this up in liburing and write a test case as well. -- Jens Axboe
