Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support
From: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 11:28:51 +0000
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-team@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAOQ4uxjZUYNjBZKU85TMCjtBf9ear7s4yxYSZcBX6rTZoYK-Hg@mail.gmail.com>

Amir Goldstein writes:

Some nits. When fixed you may add:
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks! I'll fix these and comments on the other patches and send v4 here andwith linux-mm/tmpfs maintainer on cc. :-)

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/2] fs: inode: shmem: Reduce risk of inum overflow
  - From: Chris Down
- [PATCH v3 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support
  - From: Chris Down
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support
  - From: Amir Goldstein

Prev by Date: Re: Still a pretty bad time on 5.4.6 with fuse_request_end.
Next by Date: [PATCH v4 0/2] fs: inode: shmem: Reduce risk of inum overflow
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 2/2] tmpfs: Support 64-bit inums per-sb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux