> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:07:16PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > > >> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644 > > >> --- a/fs/Makefile > > >> +++ b/fs/Makefile > > >> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlbfs/ > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/ > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/ > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/ > > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/ > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/ > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/ > > >> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped > HFS+ > > > > > > Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So > > > should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS? > > Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat. > > So I subtracted _FS suffix. > > If it's a problem, please send me a patch to rename the staging/exfat/ > config option so that you can use the "real" one someday soon. Okay, I will:) Thanks a lot! > > thanks, > > greg k-h
