Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tmpfs: Add per-superblock i_ino support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:00 PM Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Amir Goldstein writes:
> >Wouldn't it be easier to check max_inodes instead of passing this
> >use_sb_ino arg?
> >Is there any case where they *need* to differ?
>
> Hmm, I suppose probably not? In that case should I just check against
> SB_KERNMOUNT, since max_inodes can only be 0 in that case?
>

Yes, I think that would be best.

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux