Re: AZFS file system proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2008-06-17 13:57, Maxim Shchetynin wrote:

>> >> (a) What is axonram?
>> >> (b) why is axonram direct_access, and my other devices (including
>> >> standard PC RAM) not?
>> >
>> >[Axonram is a module specific for IBM CellBlade and allows access to
>> >a DDR2 memory attached onto Axon controller.] You don't need
>> >direct_access and not azfs for main memory because there is already
>> >a pretty nice tmpfs for it.
>> 
>> So the reason azfs could be useful is...?
>
>The "?" at the end of your sentence might mean a question. I would
>be really happy to give an answer on it if I could understand it.

If one does not need direct_access nor azfs, and ext2 plus XIP minus
caching or tmpfs plus XIP can achieve the same effect, what can azfs
that we could not already do without azfs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux