On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 03:12:00PM +0100, Julian Preis wrote:
> Fix spelling mistakes in exfat_core.c and exfat_super.c.
>
> Co-developed-by: Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weidner <johannes.weidner@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Preis <julian.preis@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add email recipients according to get_maintainer.pl
> - Add patch versions
> - Use in-reply-to
>
> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> index d2d3447083c7..2c688cf91eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static s32 __write_partial_entries_in_entry_set(struct super_block *sb,
> num_entries = count;
>
> while (num_entries) {
> - /* white per sector base */
> + /* write per sector base */
> remaining_byte_in_sector = (1 << p_bd->sector_size_bits) - off;
> copy_entries = min_t(s32,
> remaining_byte_in_sector >> DENTRY_SIZE_BITS,
> @@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ struct entry_set_cache_t *get_entry_set_in_dir(struct super_block *sb,
> while (num_entries) {
> /*
> * instead of copying whole sector, we will check every entry.
> - * this will provide minimum stablity and consistency.
> + * this will provide minimum stability and consistency.
> */
> entry_type = p_fs->fs_func->get_entry_type(ep);
>
> @@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ static s32 extract_uni_name_from_name_entry(struct name_dentry_t *ep, u16 *unina
> }
>
> /* return values of exfat_find_dir_entry()
> - * >= 0 : return dir entiry position with the name in dir
> + * >= 0 : return dir entry position with the name in dir
> * -1 : (root dir, ".") it is the root dir itself
> * -2 : entry with the name does not exist
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
> index 6e481908c59f..02548335ec82 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int ffsWriteFile(struct inode *inode, struct file_id_t *fid,
>
> brelse(tmp_bh);
>
> - /* (3) update the direcoty entry */
> + /* (3) update the directory entry */
> es = get_entry_set_in_dir(sb, &fid->dir, fid->entry,
> ES_ALL_ENTRIES, &ep);
> if (!es)
> @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ static int ffsReadStat(struct inode *inode, struct dir_entry_t *info)
>
> count = count_dos_name_entries(sb, &dir, TYPE_DIR);
> if (count < 0) {
> - ret = count; /* propogate error upward */
> + ret = count; /* propagate error upward */
> goto out;
> }
> info->NumSubdirs = count;
> @@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ static int ffsReadStat(struct inode *inode, struct dir_entry_t *info)
>
> count = count_dos_name_entries(sb, &dir, TYPE_DIR);
> if (count < 0) {
> - ret = count; /* propogate error upward */
> + ret = count; /* propagate error upward */
> goto out;
> }
> info->NumSubdirs += count;
> @@ -3689,7 +3689,7 @@ static int exfat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>
> /*
> * GFP_KERNEL is ok here, because while we do hold the
> - * supeblock lock, memory pressure can't call back into
> + * superblock lock, memory pressure can't call back into
> * the filesystem, since we're only just about to mount
> * it and have no inodes etc active!
> */
> --
> 2.20.1
This patch does not apply to 5.5-rc2 at all. Always work against the
latest linux-next release in order to not duplicate work that others
have done and give us a chance to apply patches to our development
trees.
thanks,
greg k-h
