Re: [PATCH 0/4] memcg, inode: protect page cache from freeing inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 17-12-19 06:29:15, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On my server there're some running MEMCGs protected by memory.{min, low},
> but I found the usage of these MEMCGs abruptly became very small, which
> were far less than the protect limit. It confused me and finally I
> found that was because of inode stealing.

What do you mean by this exactly. Are those inodes reclaimed by the
regular memory reclaim or by other means? Because shrink_node does
exclude shrinking slab for protected memcgs.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux