[PATCH v6 14/27] nfs_clone_sb_security(): simplify the check for server bogosity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

We used to check ->i_op for being nfs_dir_inode_operations.  With
separate inode_operations for v3 and v4 that became bogus, but
rather than going for protocol-dependent comparison we could've
just checked ->i_fop instead; _that_ is the same for all protocol
versions.

Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/super.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 2bcf0f8295e0..bec6c341f72c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -2578,7 +2578,7 @@ int nfs_clone_sb_security(struct super_block *s, struct dentry *mntroot,
 	unsigned long kflags = 0, kflags_out = 0;
 
 	/* clone any lsm security options from the parent to the new sb */
-	if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_op != NFS_SB(s)->nfs_client->rpc_ops->dir_inode_ops)
+	if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_fop != &nfs_dir_operations)
 		return -ESTALE;
 
 	if (NFS_SB(s)->caps & NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL)
-- 
2.17.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux