On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 06:04:38PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 10:02 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:43:26PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:20 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > This series aims at deleting timespec64_trunc().
> > > > There is a new api: timestamp_truncate() that is the
> > > > replacement api. The api additionally does a limits
> > > > check on the filesystem timestamps.
> > >
> > > Al/Andrew, can one of you help merge these patches?
> >
> > Looks sane. Could you check if #misc.timestamp looks sane to you?
>
> Yes, that looks sane to me.
>
> > One thing that leaves me scratching head is kernfs - surely we
> > are _not_ limited by any external layouts there, so why do we
> > need to bother with truncation?
>
> I think I was more pedantic then, and was explicitly truncating times
> before assignment to inode timestamps. But, Arnd has since coached me
> that we should not introduce things to safe guard against all
> possibilities, but only what is needed currently. So this kernfs
> truncate is redundant, given the limits and the granularity match vfs
> timestamp representation limits.
OK... I've tossed a followup removing the truncation from kernfs;
the whole series looks reasonably safe, but I don't think it's urgent
enough to even try getting it merged before -rc1. So here's what
I'm going to do: immediately after -rc1 it gets renamed[*] to #imm.timestamp,
which will be in the never-modified mode, in #for-next from the very
begining and safe for other trees to pull. Current shortlog:
Al Viro (1):
kernfs: don't bother with timestamp truncation
Amir Goldstein (1):
utimes: Clamp the timestamps in notify_change()
Deepa Dinamani (6):
fs: fat: Eliminate timespec64_trunc() usage
fs: cifs: Delete usage of timespec64_trunc
fs: ceph: Delete timespec64_trunc() usage
fs: ubifs: Eliminate timespec64_trunc() usage
fs: Delete timespec64_trunc()
fs: Do not overload update_time
Diffstat:
fs/attr.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 4 +---
fs/cifs/inode.c | 13 +++++++------
fs/configfs/inode.c | 9 +++------
fs/f2fs/file.c | 18 ++++++------------
fs/fat/misc.c | 10 +++++++++-
fs/inode.c | 33 +++------------------------------
fs/kernfs/inode.c | 6 +++---
fs/ntfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++------------
fs/ubifs/file.c | 18 ++++++------------
fs/ubifs/sb.c | 11 ++++-------
fs/utimes.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/fs.h | 1 -
13 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
[*] right now it's based on v5.4; I don't see anything that would
warrant rebasing it to -rc1 at the moment, but if anything of that
sort shows up tomorrow, s/renamed/rebased to -rc1 and renamed/.
