On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This patch series is a revised version of the patch series >> that I sent yesterday to fix various utimensat() >> non-conformances. Patches 1 and 2 are unchanged (and were >> Acked by Miklos); patches 3 and 4 are revised following >> comments by Miklos. >> >> As requested I've split the original patch >> ("utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)"; >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/24325 ) >> into four parts. Ideally, these should be applied for >> 2.6.26-rc, for the reasons outlined in my earlier mail >> "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (test results)", >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/689411/ . >> >> The four patches can be applied independently, except that >> patch 3 needs patch 2 to be applied first. > > ACK for all four patches. > > In patch 3/4 the indentation of that big "if" looks really horribly > broken, but it will be cleaned out completely, so I won't complain... Aargh -- true, I messed up the indentation! -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html