[PATCH 2/7] fs: cifs: Fix atime update check vs mtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



According to the comment in the code and commit log, some apps
expect atime >= mtime; but the introduced code results in
atime==mtime.  Fix the comparison to guard against atime<mtime.

Fixes: 9b9c5bea0b96 ("cifs: do not return atime less than mtime")
Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 fs/cifs/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
index 8a76195e8a69..ca76a9287456 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ cifs_fattr_to_inode(struct inode *inode, struct cifs_fattr *fattr)
 
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	/* we do not want atime to be less than mtime, it broke some apps */
-	if (timespec64_compare(&fattr->cf_atime, &fattr->cf_mtime))
+	if (timespec64_compare(&fattr->cf_atime, &fattr->cf_mtime) < 0)
 		inode->i_atime = fattr->cf_mtime;
 	else
 		inode->i_atime = fattr->cf_atime;
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux