Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Fix direct IO handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26.11.2019 15:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 11/26, Damien Le Moal wrote:
f2fs_preallocate_blocks() identifies direct IOs using the IOCB_DIRECT
flag for a kiocb structure. However, the file system direct IO handler
function f2fs_direct_IO() may have decided that a direct IO has to be
exececuted as a buffered IO using the function f2fs_force_buffered_io().
This is the case for instance for volumes including zoned block device
and for unaligned write IOs with LFS mode enabled.

These 2 different methods of identifying direct IOs can result in
inconsistencies generating stale data access for direct reads after a
direct IO write that is treated as a buffered write. Fix this
inconsistency by combining the IOCB_DIRECT flag test with the result
of f2fs_force_buffered_io().

Reported-by: Javier Gonzalez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/f2fs/data.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 5755e897a5f0..8ac2d3b70022 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1073,6 +1073,8 @@ int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	int flag;
 	int err = 0;
 	bool direct_io = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT;
+	bool do_direct_io = direct_io &&
+		!f2fs_force_buffered_io(inode, iocb, from);

 	/* convert inline data for Direct I/O*/
 	if (direct_io) {
@@ -1081,7 +1083,7 @@ int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 			return err;
 	}

-	if (direct_io && allow_outplace_dio(inode, iocb, from))
+	if (do_direct_io && allow_outplace_dio(inode, iocb, from))

It seems f2fs_force_buffered_io() includes allow_outplace_dio().

How about this?
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 13 -------------
fs/f2fs/file.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a034cd0ce021..fc40a72f7827 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1180,19 +1180,6 @@ int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
	int err = 0;
	bool direct_io = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT;

-	/* convert inline data for Direct I/O*/
-	if (direct_io) {
-		err = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
-
-	if (direct_io && allow_outplace_dio(inode, iocb, from))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC))
-		return 0;
-
	map.m_lblk = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(iocb->ki_pos);
	map.m_len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from));
	if (map.m_len > map.m_lblk)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index c0560d62dbee..6b32ac6c3382 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -3386,18 +3386,33 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
				ret = -EAGAIN;
				goto out;
			}
-		} else {
-			preallocated = true;
-			target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from);
+			goto write;
+		}

-			err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from);
-			if (err) {
-				clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC);
-				inode_unlock(inode);
-				ret = err;
-				goto out;
-			}
+		if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC))
+			goto write;
+
+		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
+			/* convert inline data for Direct I/O*/
+			err = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode);
+			if (err)
+				goto out_err;
+
+			if (!f2fs_force_buffered_io(inode, iocb, from))
+				goto write;
+		}
+		preallocated = true;
+		target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from);
+
+		err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from);
+		if (err) {
+out_err:
+			clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC);
+			inode_unlock(inode);
+			ret = err;
+			goto out;
		}
+write:
		ret = __generic_file_write_iter(iocb, from);
		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_PREALLOC);

--
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog

This also addresses the original problem.

Tested-by: Javier González <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux