…
> +++ b/fs/exfat/nls.c
…
> +static int exfat_load_upcase_table(struct super_block *sb,
> + sector_t sector, unsigned long long num_sectors,
> + unsigned int utbl_checksum)
> +{
…
> + unsigned int i, index = 0, checksum = 0;
…
> + checksum = ((checksum & 1) ? 0x80000000 : 0) +
> + (checksum >> 1) +
> + *(((unsigned char *)bh->b_data) + (i + 1));
…
> + if (index >= 0xFFFF && utbl_checksum == checksum)
> + return 0;
* Can it be that a type other than “int” would be more portable
for the desired data processing at these source code places?
* How do you think about to use more meaningful identifiers for
two of the shown literals?
Regards,
Markus
