On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:27:50AM +0800, yu kuai wrote:
> 'dentry_d_lock_class' can be used for spin_lock_nested in case lockdep
> confused about two different dentry take the 'd_lock'.
>
> However, a single 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED' may not be enough if more than
> two dentry are involed. So, and in 'DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_2'
>
> Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/dcache.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
> index 10090f1..8eb84ef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dcache.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
> @@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ struct dentry {
> enum dentry_d_lock_class
> {
> DENTRY_D_LOCK_NORMAL, /* implicitly used by plain spin_lock() APIs. */
> - DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED
> + DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED,
> + DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED_2
You should document this, as "_2" does not make much sense to anyone
only looking at the code :(
Or rename it better.
thanks,
greg k-h
