Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 02 June 2008 11:13:41 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:02:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > So again, can you offer an alternative?
>
> Just give up on this dumb idea completely.

The AppArmor guys have really gone a long way in arguing their case, and all 
discussions so far have ended in you decreeing that pathnames are bad at some 
point. Thanks a lot for your constructive input on other areas of the code, 
but could you please come up with technical arguments why pathnames are 
bad this time?

Thanks a lot!

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux