Re: [PATCH] ovl: fix timestamp limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 8:30 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Overlayfs timestamp overflow limits should be inherrited from upper
> filesystem.
>
> The current behavior, when overlayfs is over an underlying filesystem
> that does not support post 2038 timestamps (e.g. xfs), is that overlayfs
> overflows post 2038 timestamps instead of clamping them.

How?  Isn't the clamping supposed to happen in the underlying filesystem anyway?

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux